| 30 | 1 | 64 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
针对河道水闸项目展开了地基处理方案及渗流稳定性分析。通过对水闸工程的工程概况、研究方法与分析、结果等进行深入研究和分析,揭示了水闸结构的渗漏特性和稳定性。通过SEEP/W程序和Geo-Studio2018的应用,采取了稳态分析等方法,对水闸基础的渗漏情况进行了详细分析。同时,采用统计分析和实地观测结果进行了验证,确保了模型的准确性和可靠性。结果显示,河道水闸在正常使用情况下不会受到渗漏的威胁,但在极端洪水事件中需要采取措施确保结构的安全。
Abstract:This article presents a foundation treatment plan and seepage stability analysis for the river sluice project. Through in-depth research and analysis of the engineering overview, research methods and analysis, and results of the water gate project, the leakage characteristics and stability of the water gate structure have been revealed. Through the application of SEEP/W program and Geo Studio 2018, steady-state analysis and other methods were adopted to conduct a detailed analysis of the leakage situation of the sluice foundation. At the same time, statistical analysis and field observations were used to verify the accuracy and reliability of the model. The results show that river gates are not threatened by leakage under normal use, but measures need to be taken to ensure the safety of the structure in extreme flood events.
[1]冯光亮.某水闸地基处理方案及渗流稳定性分析[J].水利科技与经济,2024,30(4):75-78+84.
[2]陈伟东.水闸运营中的综合安全检测评估及稳定分析研究[J].水利科学与寒区工程,2023,6(2):124-128.
[3]罗志江.银河泵站水闸重建工程设计及稳定性分析[J].水利科学与寒区工程,2022,5(10):94-97.
[4]江高.城市防洪水闸重建设计与渗流稳定计算分析研究[J].水利技术监督,2022(9):181-185.
[5]宋文燕,范立群,李斌旭.徒骇河宫家闸除险加固方案比选及抗渗稳定分析[J].水利技术监督,2021(7):222-225.
[6]宋文燕,范立群,李斌旭.徒骇河宫家闸除险加固方案比选及抗渗稳定分析[J].吉林水利,2021(5):25-28.
[7]葛万明,蒋晓君,尤维锋.基于ANSYS的某水闸除险加固稳定性分析研究[J].水电站机电技术,2021,44(2):77-81.
[8]张云峰,张燕,张志闯.基于缺陷的水闸防渗墙渗流稳定性研究[J].水科学与工程技术,2020(6):28-31.
[9]王海.基于ADINA的高压水闸墙渗流稳定性分析[J].煤炭技术,2018,37(10):228-230.
[10]骆冠勇,曹洪,潘泓.渗流-水跃共同作用下闸下连接段稳定性分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2016,35(S2):4196-4203.
[11]鞠法龙.基于数值模型的软基水闸底板脱空反演[J].云南水力发电,2024,40(4):100-104.
[12]陈敏仪.广州南沙大滘某水闸重建工程设计方案研究[J].云南水力发电,2022,38(11):124-128.
基本信息:
中图分类号:TV66;TV223.4
引用信息:
[1]麦浚康.河道水闸地基处理方案及渗流稳定性分析[J].云南水力发电,2025,41(06):33-36.
2024-05-21
2024
2024-05-30
2024-11-12
2024
1
2025-06-15
2025-06-15